Objective
To investigate the association of quantitative paraspinal muscle measurements to the Oswestry disability index (ODI) in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Materials and Methods
Ninety two patients (mean age, 61.6 years; male, mean age, 71.8 years ; female; mean body mass index [BMI], 24.9 kg/m² ) who had undergone lumbar fusion due to spondylolisthesis with available selfcompleted postoperative ODI were included. The total cross-sectional area (CSA) and functional CSA (FCSA; i.e., area containing only lean muscle tissue) of the paraspinal muscle group (multifidus and erector spinae muscles) and the psoas muscles were measured at L2–L3, L3–L4, and L4–L5 disc levels each on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the sum of areas at each level served as representative values for each muscle. The FCSA/total CSA ratio and the skeletal muscle index (SMI=muscle area [cm² ]/patient height2 [m² ]) were calculated. Pearson’s correlation analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between preoperative paraspinal muscle measurements and postoperative ODI.
Results
Quantitative values of low paraspinal muscle showed significant correlation with high ODI values. As a result of this study, the preoperative paraspinal muscle was quantified in the group of patients undergoing spinal fusion. Patients with low value in CSA and FCSA of paraspinal muscle could observe the tendency to transition to low clinical outcomes. Therefore, quantitative values of surrounding muscles are factors affecting clinical outcomes of patients undergoing spinal surgery Conclusion: Smaller muscle bulk (total CSA) of psoas muscles and lean muscle mass (FCSA) of paraspinal muscle group and psoas muscles combined on preoperative MRI were associated with significant postoperative disability based on ODI in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Background
Context: There are few reports of changes in global sagittal alignment and corresponding factors like hand grip strength (HGS) and muscle performance tests to detect changes in global sagittal alignment after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine whether HGS can be a useful predictive marker of global sagittal alignment changes after decompression with fusion surgery for LSS. Study Design: This is a retrospective observational study. Patient Sample: Patients who underwent spine surgery for LSS were included in the present study. Outcome Measures: Radiological spinopelvic parameters including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), global tilt (GT), and T1 pelvic angle (T1PA) were assessed. Clinical outcomes parameters like Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Euro-QOL (EQ-5D), visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back or leg pain were assessed. To assess muscle performance, three functional mobility tests (6-meter walk test, timed up and go test, sit-to-stand test) and HGS were checked.
Materials and Methods
A total 91 consecutive patients who underwent spine fusion surgery for LSS were included. 1 year after posterior decompression and fusion surgery, the patients were further classified into four groups according to preoperative and postoperative SVA. We analyzed radiological parameters like SVA, LL, PT, PI, GT, and T1PA. The ODI, the EQ-5D and VAS scores for back or leg pain were recorded as clinical outcomes assessment. To assess muscle performance, SMT, TUGT, STS, and HGS were checked.
Results
HGS was significantly correlated with age, postoperative SVA, ODI, EQ-5D and muscle performance test. HGS was related with change of preoperative sagittal alignment 1yr after surgery. Using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the cutoff values of HGS as predictors of postoperative balanced sagittal alignment according to SVA, cutoff value of HGS demonstrated 19.5 kg with a sensitivity of 82.1% and specificity of 66.7%.
Conclusion
Patients with non-balanced sagittal alignment in LSS demonstrated decreased muscle function and muscle strength. If the muscle strength was weak in the group in which the sagittal balance was maintained preoperatively, it could be converted to non-balanced sagittal alignment. Thus, preoperative HGS may be a good predictor of postoperative SVA change.