Purpose
To analyze the serial change of the cervical saggital alignment especially cobb angle from immediately post operation to 3 month of post operation, and evaluate the effect of anatomically designed pillow to restore cervical lordosis.
Materials and Methods
cervical cobb angle (C2-C7) was measured in 38 patients whose radiographs at immediately post op, post op 1mo and post op 3mo were completely equipped. The patient group consisted of 10 patients in the general pillow group, 19 patients in the cervical pillow group, and 9 patients in the Philadelphia orthosis group.
Results
There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups using any pillow and the group using Philadelphia orthosis. Among them, patients who used anatomically designed pillow for 1 month to 3 months postoperatively were more likely to have lordotic change than the other patients, though it was not statistically significant.
Conclusion
The use of a cervical orthosis until the first month after the operation and subsequently anatomically degsined pillow for up to 3 months may be considered as a way to maintain lordotic curvature and prevent kyphotic changes.

Purpose
To compare change in biomechanical function at operated and adjacent segments and clinical results after inserting three different designs of cervical artificial arthroplasty devices.
Materials and Methods
Retrospective analysis was performed for 60 patients who had undergone single level cervical artificial arthroplasty in authors’ hospital from November 2003 to January 2010. Bryan, Prestige LP and Prodisc– C artificial discs were used in 34, 17 and 9 patients respectively. We compared preoperative and postoperative biomechanical function of operated and adjacent segments radiographically and clinical results using VAS and NDI.
Results
Biomechanical results showed as follows: range of motion(ROM) of operated and overall cervical spine was well maintained postoperatively regardless of type of devices; Prodisc – C showed statistically significant recovery of sagittal alignment at the operated segment compared to preoperative status(p=0.021); adjacent level just inferior to the operated segment showed decrease in postoperative ROM with Bryan(p=0.000); anterior intervertebral height also decreased at that segment(p=0.001); no difference showed with VAS and NDI in the three artificial disc devices.
Conclusion
Clinical results of cervical artificial arthroplasty did not show significant difference during the follow-up period, but there were statistically significant changes in biomechanical function. Therefore, adequate selection of disc device is important in cervical arthroplasty.