• KOSASS
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

Mini-open Approach for Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Chong-Suh Lee1, Sung-Soo Chung1, Young-Ryeol Pae2, Kyung-Jung Kang1, Chulhee Jung1
Journal of Advanced Spine Surgery 2011;1(2):77-84.
Published online: December 31, 2011
1Spine Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea
Corresponding author:  Chong-Suh Lee, Tel: 82-2-3410-3509, Fax: 82-2-3410-0061, 
Email: ch999.jung@samsung.com
  • 7 Views
  • 1 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
prev next

Introduction
Recently, minimally invasive lateral approach for the lumbar spine is revived and getting popularity under the name of XLIF or DLIF by modification of mini-open method using sequential tubular dilator and special expandable retractor system. Purposes: The purposes of this study were to introduce the mini-open lateral approach for the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), and to investigate the advantages, technical pitfalls and complications & to provide basic knowledge on XLIF or DLIF
Materials and Methods
Seventy-four patients who underwent surgery by the mini-open lateral approach from September 2000 to April 2008 with various disease entities were included. Blood loss, operation time, incision size, postoperative time to mobilization, length of hospital stay, technical problems and complications were analyzed.
Results
With this approach, we can reach form T12 to L5 subdiaphragmatically. The blood loss and operation time of patients who underwent simple ALIF were 61.2 ml and 86 minutes for one level, 107 ml and 106 minutes for two levels, 250 ml and 142.8 minutes for three levels, and 400 ml and 190 minutes for four levels of fusion, respectively. The incision sizes were on average 4.5cm for one level, 6.3 cm for two levels, 8.5 cm for three levels and 10.0 cm for four levels of fusion. The complications were retroperitoneal hematoma in two cases, pneumonia in one case and transient lumbosacral plexus palsy in three cases.
Conclusion
The mini-open lateral approach is simpler & safer than XLIF or DLIF with very short learning curve. Trial of mini-open lateral approach would be helpful before trial of XLIF or DLIF. However, special attention is required to complications such as transient lumbosacral plexus palsy.

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Mini-open Approach for Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
J Adv Spine Surg. 2011;1(2):77-84.   Published online December 31, 2011
Download Citation
Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
  • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
  • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
Include:
  • Citation for the content below
Mini-open Approach for Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
J Adv Spine Surg. 2011;1(2):77-84.   Published online December 31, 2011
Close
TOP