• KOSASS
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

Early Revision After Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Causes and Strategies

Dae-Jung Choi, Je-Tea Jung, Yong-Sang Kim, Han-Jin Jang, Bang Yoo
Journal of Advanced Spine Surgery 2017;7(1):34-40.
Published online: June 30, 2017
Spine Center, Barun Hospital, Jin-Ju, South Korea
Corresponding author:  Dae-Jung Choi, Tel: +82--55-790-3000, Fax: +82-55-790-3030, 
Email: djchoi9@hanmail.net
  • 4 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
prev next

Background
Owing to its new introduction, there are few documents on pit-falls of biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS) clinically. The authors reported etiologies in need of early exploration after BESS for lumbar degenerative diseases and strategies to overcome them.
Methods
BESS were performed for lumbar spine diseases (LSDs) by two spine surgeons from December 2013 to March 2016. Postoperative MRI was checked for all cases and following-up MRIs in the case in need of revision surgery within six months after the first surgery due to pain intolerable, sustained or recurred. The complicated cases were reviewed and classified as radiographic and operative findings to reveal the main reasons for early explorations.
Results
The 562 cases (M:295, F:267, Age 58.5±14.1 yrs, 20~88 yrs) included lumbar disc herniation (LDH) (255 cases), extraforaminal disc herniation (22 cases), spinal stenosis (218 cases), degenerative spondylolisthesis (27 cases), revision surgery after recurred disc herniation or restenosis after open surgery (24 cases), juxtafacet cyst (11 cases), adjacent segment stenosis with fusion surgery (3 cases), and spondylolytic spondylolisthesis (2 cases). Early explorations were needed in 43 cases (7.7%) at 26.1±31.5 days after the initial operations. Causative etiologies were listed as recurred LDH (12 cases, 27.9%), remnant stenosis (7 cases, 16.3%), remained ruptured disc fragment (6 cases, 14.0%), root edema (5 cases, 11.6%), synovitis (4 cases, 9.3%), hematoma (3 cases, 7.0%), dura tear (2 cases, 4.7%), recurred stenosis (2 cases. 4.7%), wrong level (1 case, 2.3%) and postoperative fungal infection (1 case, 2.3%). Thirty-one cases (72.1%) were revised within 4 weeks and most conditions (40 cases, 93.0%) were improved after early exploration using BESS. Two cases of dura tear were conversed to open repair. One case of fungal infection was suspected to related with the patient’s medical illness including long-term steroid use for chronic lung disease with pulmonary fibrosis and Diabetes mellitus.
Conclusions
Preoperative planning should be prepared carefully to decrease early exploration. It was helpful to comparing MRIs immediately postoperative and early following-up to find the reasons. Don’t hesitate to explore the operated site again using BESS, because most etiologies are supposed to be controlled by early exploration without need of converting to open surgery except in the case of dura tear in need of dural repair.

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Early Revision After Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Causes and Strategies
J Adv Spine Surg. 2017;7(1):34-40.   Published online June 30, 2017
Download Citation
Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
  • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
  • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
Include:
  • Citation for the content below
Early Revision After Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Causes and Strategies
J Adv Spine Surg. 2017;7(1):34-40.   Published online June 30, 2017
Close
TOP